Community Server

The platform that enables you to build rich, interactive communities
Welcome to Community Server Sign in | Join | Help
in Search

Parenting Isn't For Sissies

Though I have graduate degrees in and experience practicing both family therapy and school counseling, the truth is, I often find myself bewildered when parenting my own children. In my stories about the humbling and hilarious reality of life with kids, I will try to connect with you – because you struggle with, laugh about and muddle through parenting, just like I do. Parenting isn't for sissies ... but sometimes I feel like one. –Jennifer DuBose

Some Implications of Skipping a Grade: Pre-K or K?

I responded to the following query posted in one of our discussion forums, but wanted to highlight it here as I think a lot of parents wrestle with the same conundrum:  

"I'm the mom of an exceptionally bright 4 year old who just completed Preschool.  He enjoyed the socializing aspect of preschool but had to be challenged daily because he is so bright.  He has been reading for a year now and currently reads and comprehends on a 1st grade level.  He knows all the letters, letter sounds and can write all the letters.  He sounds out words and has quite the vocabulary.  He can write several words.  He can count and is grasping addition.  He is probably more computer savvy than me.  I can't take any credit for any of this.  It has all come naturally.

The issue in our household is whether to send him onto Pre K next year (he will not turn 5 until November) or to have him tested for Kindergarten.  My husband thinks his little brainiac should go to Kindergarten but I, on the other hand, realize that my little Einstein is a bit immature and may benefit from another year with peers his own age."

As a family therapist and school counselor I often get this question.  My bias is generally to keep kids with their same-aged peers, as academic development is not the only focus of the school experience.  Kids also need to develop as emotional and social creatures, and this can be challenging if they regularly attend school with older kids.  Consider that many parents in our area already have their kids begin K a year late for various reasons, chief among them an apparent desire to make their kids more competitive as they age (sports, academic scholarships, etc.) -- though some have valid concerns about their child's maturity or readiness for school.  Whatever the reason for their choices, consider too that girls generally mature more quickly physically and sometimes emotionally -- so a boy leaping ahead of his age-mates could have classmates a couple of years advanced in areas besides the academic.  This isn't wholly negative, but it means that you'll have to contend with certain issues earlier.  Your child's friends may be driving cars, considering sexuality, or experimenting with substances earlier than you may be comfortable. 

As for your child's academic needs, there are wonderful programs already in place in many Illinois public schools that challenge kids who need or want additional challenges.  Nobody wants your child to be bored, which can net a number of results: you might get a fidgity kid who ends up acting-out, causing observers (teachers and parents) to misname the problem, or even find that a child who is underwhelmed and understimulated ironically performs below typical grade-level expectations.  These are interesting possibilities worth thoughtful exploration.

No matter your decision, remember that you are the expert on your child (though the final decision about grade assignment must be made in collaboration with your school district, based on a number of variables, including resources). 

For me, while there are endless whiny days when I just wanna drop kick my offspring to the moon (or to college a little early...), I'm occasionally jealous of those parents who thought to keep their kids back a year before beginning kindergarten.  Oh, you know, they get to enjoy their sidekicks at home another year, and can revel in the cozy illusion a tad longer that they can actually insulate their babies from the harsher realities of 'real life' beyond the nest.

So I'll put the question to all of you veteran parents out there, who've perhaps already faced this concern and have some kernels of wisdom to pass along.  How do we capitalize on the school experience as an opportunity to best meet the academic, social and emotional needs of our children?

–Jennifer DuBose, M.S., C.A.S. has been a Clinical Member of The American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy(AAMFT) since 1995.  Got a question or concern you’d like her to address?  Nothing is off limits.  If you’re a parent and it’s on your mind, chances are you’re not alone.  Don’t suffer the wonders.  Send your questions to parentingisntforsissies@hotmail.comYour name and other identifying information will be kept strictly confidential.

Published Sunday, June 08, 2008 10:47 AM by Jennifer DuBose

Comments

 

Sandi said:

I have been staring at this blank box for five minutes now, trying to think through what to say. This subject hits me where the mommy guilt hurts the most.

• Maturity level is number one.

• School district resources is number two.

My advise is to talk to the principal, talk to a couple of teachers; most importantly talk to parents. Find out if the school has above level, advanced programs already in place.

Yes Jen, by law the school district has to blah, blah, blah... (I promised myself I would not be negative here) All I want to say is that each kid is different. Each school is different. Each school district has different goals it has to make. Some teachers have the ability to supplement the curriculum for advanced kids and some don't. You really have to get in there and do some digging to find out what your school can and can't offer.

Sandi  

June 10, 2008 2:13 PM
 

Jennifer DuBose said:

Don’t even get me started on mommy-guilt.  My offsprings' chief complaint today was that my need to deliver fresh-cut flowers from my garden to someone as an expression of gratitude prevailed over their desire to get to the beach.  I won because I had the keys to the car, but it wasn’t very satisfying.  The fact that we eventually made it to the beach didn’t seem to matter – I was still public enemy number one.  

Go figure.  

And don’t go hogging Mommy-guilt hell all for yourself, ‘cuz no matter how many strawberries I pick with my kids or how many sandcastles I build, I seem to be headed there myself.  Fast and hard.

I’m glad you injected some realism here, Sandi.  In spite of the idealism of the law that requires schools to provide what each individual child needs and deserves, the reality is that sometimes they just can’t.  Though many times advocacy does make a difference (the squeaky wheel gets the grease), sometimes you just can’t get blood from a stone.  I get that.  The No Child Left Behind Mandate has double-bound a lot of schools and teachers, who sometimes don’t have the resources to meet the expectations of this mandate – let alone the actual needs of the very real children and parents they face on a daily basis – by virtue of limited resources, including the wildly variable property tax base from which school districts draw.  I get that.  It’s not as simple as saying, “Well, we’ll just pick up and move to a district which will provide thus-and-such for our child.” So many variables go into deciding where to place your kids, and frankly there are some limits that simply cannot be overcome.  

The goal, then, as I see it, is to discover possibilities within the limitations that exist in your particular situation.  Sometimes nifty surprises can be eked out.  Sometimes our efforts fall flat, or our voices fall upon deaf ears or empty coffers.  Sometimes children are swaddled with supports; sometimes they bloom in spite if their absence.  Sometimes they just get by.  Sometimes they don’t.  I hate that that is still a very real possibility in this country.  

June 10, 2008 10:30 PM
 

Jennifer DuBose said:

By the way, folks needing affirmation for and encouragement with the challenge of meeting their gifted kids' needs should check out Dr. Bertie Kingore's work on-line at bertiekingore.com.  She is a noted education consultant and advocate.  Another fave of mine is Boston-based Alfie Kohn, a former classroom teacher and current lecturer on subjects including education, parenting and psychology (he visits Chicago-land occasionally).  Google him for a really refreshing perspective.

June 10, 2008 10:55 PM
 

Sandi said:

I have a kid who was reading at 4th grade level in 1st grade. In 2nd grade she was doing her 4th grade sister's homework for fun (only the sister knew, the teacher and I did not catch on to that for a long time). In 3rd grade she went to 4th grade for reading and math. The first day of 4th grade math, she came home with a big smile on her face and said "Mr. S. actually taught me something today that I didn't already know". That was the day the guilt hit me hard.

After that day, this squeaky wheel finally got her way. The kid did a half a year of 4th grade and a half a year of 5th grade. She was very happy when she got to middle school and no one knew she was a year younger and she was no longer labeled as the smart kid. The reality is that she should have moved earlier, perhaps from 1st to 3rd.

She excells in everything she touches and she handled the skip with a huge amount of maturity. Even having to wait another year to drive, behind her older friends did not faze her. But - she still hates to be singled out as "smart"; that just takes her back to when she was little and teased.

There are so many factors to think about. Obvious things include friends, she lost some who couldn't deal with her move. Also she will be only 17 when she starts college. A not obvious one is that we will be paying for 2 kids in college at the same time for 3 years instead of 2.

In the end, skipping was a good move for her. But it is not a decision to be taken lightly.

June 12, 2008 10:47 AM
 

Kim Moldofsky said:

I think Sandi's story is common and her advice is a good.

Haivng had some "issues" with my own gifted children, I feel compelled to note that, sadly, gifted children are not entitled to an "adequate and appropriate education" in Illinois. Many public schools will act to meet the needs of gifted children, but there is no law mandating public schools to provide gifted education in Illinois. For a good state-by-state overview of gifted laws and other great info check out www.geniusdenied.com.

July 1, 2008 10:58 PM
 

Jennifer DuBose said:

Well, egg on my face (or maybe 'frittata' is more fitting, eh?).  Turns out that 30 states in the Union presently mandate and at least partially fund programming for kids identified as 'gifted,' and that Kim is correct: Illinois is not among those that mandate it.  Our state does provide some funds to school districts to spend as they see fit, however.  This is where parents' advocacy efforts are priceless.  The squeaky wheel sometimes gets the grease.   

In Maine, where I most recently worked as a school counselor, programming for gifted students is both mandated and funded.   (Contrary to popular belief, Maine is a state with populations ranging from the uber wealthy to the poverty-stricken).

Check out a 2004 article written by Beverley Scobell and posted at the following address to get the dirt on the Illinois conundrum:

http://illinoisissues.uis.edu/features/2004june/educate.html

My apologies for any confusion caused by my post.  You'll notice that I deleted the erronious information.  

July 4, 2008 2:25 PM
Anonymous comments are disabled

This Blog

Syndication

Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems